Without big men, what's the point?

Published by www.probasketballnews.com on 09/07/2008
Link: http://www.probasketballnews.com/todd_070908.html

Quick. Name a team that has won an NBA championship in the last 15 years with a dominant point guard as its centerpiece?

Having trouble? That’s because there are none.

So why are we consistently hearing now that the NBA is a point guard’s league, when history tells us otherwise?

The theory seems to have arisen because of the stellar play of third-year point guards Chris Paul and Deron Williams, who have not only had tremendous individual success, but team success as well.

But can a team led by a dominant point guard win the ultimate prize? Let’s examine recent history.

Since 1999, eight of the 10 NBA championships have involved either Shaquille O’Neal or Tim Duncan, two of the greatest post players to ever play the game. The two exceptions are the 2008 Boston Celtics and the 2004 Detroit Pistons. Both teams relied on a combination of physical defense and balanced offense to beat the odds and claim a title.

OK, let’s go back even further. During the 1990’s, the Michael Jordan-led Chicago Bulls won six NBA championships (1991-93 and 1996-98), the Houston Rockets won two (1994-95) and the Detroit Pistons one (1990).

The Bulls championship teams of the 90's did not have a dominant post player or point guard, but let’s take a look at their strategy. Phil Jackson’s Triangle offense creates regular post-up opportunities for versatile wing players, and with Jordan and Scottie Pippen filling that role, they were unbeatable.

On the other hand, the Rockets' championships were due in large part to another
Hall of Fame post player, Hakeem Olajuwon (two-time Finals MVP).

So we have to go back almost 20 years to 1990 to find a Hall of Fame point guard in Isiah Thomas who led the Pistons to an NBA championship (and gained a Finals MVP).

As for San Antonio point guard Tony Parker ... well, he is a tremendous player and top three point guard in the league. But let’s face it, he’s more of a complementary player who feeds off the brilliance of Tim Duncan. Yes, Parker won the Finals MVP in 2007, but generally speaking, he’s not consistently dominant like Paul or Williams. It's true that Parker is only 26-years old, and he may yet develop that type of consistency, particularly as Duncan’s play begins to decline. But he hasn't yet.

The 2008 Finals featured two teams with role-playing point guards. The Celtics started second-year point man Rajon Rondo, who is extremely talented but still very much a work in progress. The Los Angeles Lakers went with trusty veteran Derek Fisher in the backcourt, but in reality he’s more of a combo guard than a pure point guard. Thus, both teams reached the grand stage without being heavily reliant upon dominant point guard play.

Rather, offensively speaking, Boston relied on the inside-outside versatility of Kevin Garnett and Paul Pierce, while the Lakers fed off Kobe Bryant’s dominance. Garnett is capable of being a dominant post scorer in stretches, but because of the limited amount of time he plays in the post he cannot be labelled an elite post player.

Steve Nash won the league MVP in both 2005 and 2006, yet was still unable to lead a talented Phoenix Suns team to the Finals. When it’s all said and done, Nash will be remembered as one of the all-time great point guards, but his inability to win a title will tarnish his legacy, as with other Hall of Fame players who come up short (Charles Barkley, Karl Malone, Patrick Ewing, etc.). With the current situation in Phoenix, one has to wonder how long Nash's championship window will remain open.

In regard to the most recent NBA draft, as expected the Bulls selected Memphis point guard Derrick Rose with the first pick. There is no doubt that the Bulls will improve with Rose running the point, but until they acquire a reliable low-post scorer they will not contend for a championship. There is a reason why talented teams like the Bulls and New Jersey Nets drastically fell away this past season, mostly due to their complete lack of low-post scoring and total reliance on jump shooters.

It’s actually quite simple if you think about it. A low-post scorer by definition sets up close to the basket, thus making it an easier shot. Jump shooters, on the other hand, attempt shots that are further away from the basket, making it more difficult and less reliable.

Call me old-fashioned, but if given the choice of drafting a Dwight Howard or Greg Oden, or Chris Paul or Deron Williams, I would choose big over small every time.

I have no doubt that Paul and Williams are headed for superstardom -- but until proven otherwise, I will hold onto the belief that together with solid defense, an NBA championship is won through great post play or legendary brilliance.